The History of Trademarks: Ancient Symbols to Australian Law

May 16, 2025

The History of Trademarks: From Ancient Symbols to Australian Law

When I first started working as a Trademark Attorney 20 years ago, I was surprised to discover why Trademarks are as old as some of the most ancient 'brands' of all time.


Trademarks aren't just some modern legal invention –  symbols have been with us since humans first started making and trading goods and services. From the ancient symbol of the crucifix, to today's battles over hashtags and virtual property, the story of trademarks is essentially the story of the creation of "icons".


Lets turn the pages of history and how this  relates to us here in Australia – to help fellow business owners understand where these laws came from and why they matter so much today.


Key Takeaways


  • Trademarks date back to ancient civilizations as simple ownership marks
  • Medieval guilds transformed these marks into early brand protection systems
  • The Industrial Revolution forced the creation of formal trademark laws
  • Australia's trademark system evolved from British law but was shaped by international treaties
  • Understanding this history helps protect your modern brand, whether physical or digital


What Exactly Is a Trademark?


At its heart, a trademark is just a badge of origin – a way of saying, "This is my badge of identity". Advising clients in how to protect their trademark, the process made me appreciate that a trademark isn't just about the logo itself; it's about what that name represents. In Australia, your trademark might be a company name, a catchy slogan, a distinctive sound, or even a unique smell.


I explained this to a Digital Agency client of mine: "Your logo isn't just art – it's your business identity. And that identity deserves protection." It became abundantly clear: without registration, anyone could claim rights to any of the work that the Digital Agency provides on behalf of their clients.


Why Should You Care About Trademark History?


You might wonder why some of the worlds oldest symbols: the crucifix, the symbols of astrology, or the medieval bread law from 1266 matters to your modern business.  Here's the truth I've learned after two decades in business: understanding the evolution of trademark law gives you crucial context for navigating today's complex digital landscape.


When my client Emily lost the rights to her business name because someone else registered it first, I realised how vulnerable we all are without proper trademark protection. Whether you're selling handmade goods on Etsy or launching the next brand for your clients, trademark history shows what happens when protection falls through the cracks. Plus, it's just fascinating to see how the same principles that protected ancient potters still help protect your Instagram handle today.


Early Origins of Trademarks


Ancient Branding Was Surprisingly Sophisticated


I visited the Melbourne Lume exhibit in Southbank last year and was impressed in how they were able to repurpose significant art works from Leonardo Davinci.  Grand Experiences have crafted an incredibly sophisticated IP licensing system out of Leanardo's master works. He was a master of symbolism and used motifs. The Vertuivian man is just one of these used, to describe "The Perfect Man". And lets not forget about the infamous Mona Lisa and her stare.


Ancient Greek blacksmiths and potters used to also personalise their symbols too. Roman brickmakers stamped every brick they produced so buyers knew exactly who made what.


These weren't just decorative touches. They served very practical purposes:


  • They recognised and established identity
  • They built a reputation and trust
  • They created accountability


If your amphora cracked or your olive oil was subpar, people knew exactly who was responsible. I think of it as the ancient equivalent of a one-star Google review – reputation was everything, even back then.


Medieval and Renaissance Trademark Practices

Guilds: The Original Brand Police


The Middle Ages saw the rise of trade guilds throughout Europe – essentially professional associations that controlled everything from baking to blacksmithing. When I was in Europe to visit the World Economic Forum in 2025, I visited the Guildhall and learned how seriously these organisations took their marks. Each guild had its symbol, and members were required to use it – like a verified badge indicating quality. These marks served multiple purposes:


  • They helped customers avoid counterfeits
  • They resolved disputes when products failed
  • They protected the collective reputation


If someone sold shoddy leather under the guild's mark, the entire guild would get involved. It wasn't just about branding – it was about maintaining standards across an entire industry.


Trademark Protection During the Renaissance


During the Renaissance, personal branding became even more sophisticated. Artists began prominently signing their paintings. Goldsmiths etched identifying marks onto their jewellrry. Printers developed distinctive colophons for their books.


The concept of a "mark" evolved from simple identification to something that carried legal weight and represented personal identity plus quality assurance. By this point, these marks were widely recognized as having real legal and commercial value – setting the stage for the first formal trademark laws.


The Birth of Modern Trademark Laws


The First Real Trademark Law: Bakers & Bread


The year 1266 saw what many historians consider the first true trademark legislation: England's Bakers' Marking Law. This law required all bakers to stamp their bread with an identifying mark. At first glance, this might seem like a simple regulation, but it was quite clever. The law's purpose was to prevent bakers from cheating customers on weight or quality – if your bread was too light or contained questionable ingredients, authorities knew exactly who to fine. This direct connection between identity and accountability remains at the heart of trademark law today.


The Industrial Revolution Changed Everything


When I teach business workshops, I always highlight how dramatically the Industrial Revolution informed our Intellectual Property laws. Before mass production, most goods were made locally by known craftspeople. But once factories started churning out thousands of identical-looking products, consumers suddenly needed reliable ways to distinguish between manufacturers. Also the invention of the printing press brought new laws into existence,


The need became urgent: how could you tell genuine products from fakes? How could businesses protect their reputation when competitors could easily copy their appearance?


Britain responded with the Trade Marks Registration Act of 1875, creating the first modern trademark registry. This allowed businesses to formally register their brands and gain legal protection. This legislation laid the groundwork for the system we still use today, becoming crucial for emerging global brands like Coca-Cola, Ford, and Nestlé.


The Global Influence on Australia's Trademark Law


Australia's first Trade Marks Act arrived in 1975, but it didn't emerge from a vacuum. As a former British colony, our early trademark laws were heavily influenced by the British system.


Later, international treaties played an enormous role in shaping Australian trademark law into what we know today. My legal studies professor would always emphasise three key agreements:


  • The Paris Convention (1883) – the first truly global agreement on intellectual property
  • The Madrid Protocol – which lets you register a trademark in multiple countries with one application
  • The TRIPS Agreement (1995) – which set global IP standards under the World Trade Organization


According to the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO), these agreements helped standardise how trademarks are defined and protected globally. Australia aligns with these international systems – especially as Australian businesses began expanding overseas. Our current system reflects this global harmonisation while maintaining some uniquely Australian characteristics.


Part 2: Trademarks in the Digital Age and Australian Legal History


How the Digital Age Changed Trademarks


When I started my first online business in 2008, I grew a further appreciation for the art of branding. To grow a symbol of distinction that would serve to distinguish clients brand and reputation in the marketplace. I also recognised how the internet fundamentally transformed trademark law in ways nobody could have predicted.


Suddenly, you weren't just protecting your logo on physical products – you needed to protect your brand across search engines, domain names, and social media profiles.


1. E-commerce Made Branding Truly Global


Before widespread internet access, most businesses operated locally or regionally. Now, a small boutique Surf Shop in Byron Bay can sell to customers in Berlin overnight. This global reach means your trademark needs protection across multiple jurisdictions. That's where international systems like the Madrid Protocol became invaluable – allowing you to file one application to protect your brand in over 100 countries. One of my current clients are expanding their brand to five different continents and seven different countries for a global product launch. This will protect their brand across the world, before they launch their software product.


2. Domain Name Disputes Became a Serious Issue


The early internet saw a gold rush for domain names, with some people buying domains that matched famous brands, hoping to sell them for profit – a practice called cybersquatting.


One of my successful clients mentioned in our Success Stories  is a client named Goro Gupta. One of his successful brand  has faced challenges when a client discovered someone had purchased a domain name identical to his name and subseqent registered trademark. Fortunately, trademark owners gained protection through the Uniform Domain-Name Dispute-Resolution Policy (UDRP), which resolves these conflicts more efficiently than traditional courts. If someone in Australia registers a domain that violates your trademark rights, you can file a UDRP complaint and potentially recover it without lengthy litigation.


3. Trademarks Extended to Social Media and Hashtags


Can you trademark a hashtag? As I learned while helping a fashion designer protect her brand, the answer is yes – but only if it clearly identifies your specific brand. Today's brands are trademarking not just company names, but catchphrases, usernames, and even distinctive emoji combinations. If someone uses your Instagram handle in a way that might confuse consumers about the source of goods or services, that could constitute trademark infringement. This evolution shows how digital life is increasingly intertwined with trademark law.


Cyber Trademarks and the Metaverse


I have advised a Norweigan Technology Company in Augmented Reality and advised how in the new metaverse  trademarks can be protected in virtual spaces. As technology evolves, so do trademark applications. Businesses now need protection for virtual goods, digital logos, and names used in metaverse platforms. For instance, if you sell virtual clothing in an online game and someone copies your logo on their digital merchandise, trademark law can help stop the infringement.


Even NFTs are being trademarked now – something unimaginable just a few years ago. Australia has had to adapt quickly to these changes. IP Australia now accepts trademark applications for digital assets, and our courts are beginning to hear more cases related to virtual property and digital brand protection.


Famous Trademark Cases in Australia


Australia has seen some fascinating trademark battles that have helped shape our current laws. Here are a few that stand out:


UGG Boots v Deckers: An Iconic Australian Battle


The Ugg Boots v Deckers case is a landmark example of how failing to secure international intellectual property rights can lead to the loss of cultural and commercial control over a brand. In Australia, “ugg” was long considered a generic term for sheepskin boots, embedded in surf culture and everyday vernacular. But in the United States and elsewhere, Deckers Outdoor Corporation registered “UGG” as a trademark, transforming a colloquial Australian term into a globally protected brand. When Australian manufacturer Eddie Oygur tried to sell his locally made “ugg boots” overseas, Deckers sued for trademark infringement and won, with a U.S. court affirming Deckers’ ownership and ordering Oygur to pay damages. This case underscores the critical importance of understanding that trademarks are territorial: what’s generic in one country can be protected property in another.


For Australian entrepreneurs, the lesson is clear—if your brand, product, or idea has export potential, you must secure its intellectual property rights globally before someone else does. The case also highlights the tension between cultural heritage and commercial law in the international marketplace. Ugg boots, once a humble symbol of Australian surf culture, became a multimillion-dollar global brand—just not owned by Australians. In the ideas economy, identity itself can be commodified, and without proactive IP strategy, others can capitalise on it first. This case highlights the tension between global brands and local terminology – and shows how trademarks can have different meanings across different markets.


Hells Angels Motorcycle Corporation v Redbubble (2019)


I followed this case closely because (G: Insert your own story or example) it affected some online retailers I work with. Redbubble, the popular print-on-demand marketplace, was selling merchandise featuring Hells Angels logos uploaded by independent designers.


When Hells Angels sued for trademark infringement, the court ruled that Redbubble hadn't done enough to prevent the sale of trademarked content by third parties.


This case sent a clear warning to online platforms in Australia: you can be liable if you allow others to sell infringing products on your site, even if you didn't create the designs yourself.


Burger King vs. Hungry Jack's: A Trademark Tussle Down Under


This dispute has always fascinated me as a perfect example of how trademarks can shape entire business strategies.


When Burger King entered Australia in 1971, it couldn't use its original name because someone else had already registered it. Instead, they launched under "Hungry Jack's" – created specifically for the Australian market.

In the 1990s, after the original trademark lapsed, Burger King tried to reclaim its name. They began opening Burger


King-branded stores and reportedly attempted to undermine Hungry Jack's by blocking new store approvals.

The battle culminated in 2001 when the NSW Supreme Court ruled in favor of Hungry Jack's, finding that Burger King had breached its franchise agreement in bad faith. As a result, Burger King withdrew from direct operations in Australia, and Hungry Jack's retained exclusive franchise rights.


This case became a landmark in Australian franchise law and highlighted the power of local trademarks against global brand strategies.


How Trademark Law in Australia Has Evolved


Trademark protection in Australia continues to adapt to new technologies and business practices. It's been shaped by:


  • Emerging technologies like NFTs and AI-generated logos
  • International pressure to harmonize with global IP standards
  • Local business needs reflected in court rulings


IP Australia has expanded what can be trademarked beyond traditional logos and names. You can now trademark distinctive sounds (like the Tarzan yell), colors (like the Cadbury purple), shapes (like the Coca-Cola bottle), and even 3D objects. Look out the metaverse!


With digital businesses becoming increasingly important to our economy, Australian trademark laws are focusing more on protecting intellectual property across online platforms and international markets.

More Australian brands are filing international trademarks using the Madrid Protocol, making it easier for local businesses to protect their identity as they expand globally.


The Future of Trademarks in Australia


Having attended several industry conferences this past year, I've noticed some clear trends emerging in trademark law. The next decade will likely bring:


  • AI-generated trademarks raising questions about ownership and originality
  • Expanded protection for digital avatars and virtual property in metaverse platforms
  • Faster international dispute resolution using automated systems
  • Enhanced social media monitoring and enforcement tools for brands dealing with copycats
  • More accessible online application and monitoring tools from IP Australia for small businesses


To stay ahead of these changes, I recommend keeping your trademark registrations current, monitoring your brand presence online, and consulting with a trademark specialist when entering new markets or launching new products.


FAQs About the History of Trademarks


What is the oldest known trademark?


While the oldest continuously used registered trademark is the red triangle of Bass Ale (registered in the UK in 1876), maker's marks have been found on pottery dating back thousands of years to ancient civilizations in Egypt, China, and Rome.These ancient marks weren't "registered" in the modern sense, but they served the same essential purpose: identifying who made the product and assuring its quality.


How did Australia adopt international trademark laws?


Whilst our laws around Trademarks are enshrined from the common law system in the Trademarks Act 1995  Australia formally joined several key international treaties, including the Paris Convention, Madrid Protocol, and TRIPS Agreement. These agreements required Australia to align its domestic laws with globally accepted standards. The process wasn't immediate – it happened gradually through legislative updates and court decisions that interpreted how these international obligations should work within our legal system.


Can you trademark social media usernames in Australia?


Yes, you can trademark social media usernames in Australia, provided they meet certain criteria. Your username must be distinctive and used in commerce to identify your business or brand. I've helped several clients secure trademark protection for their social media handles, which has proven invaluable when dealing with copycat accounts. Registering through IP Australia gives you stronger legal protection than simply having the username registered on the platform itself.


Conclusion: Why Trademark History Still Matters


When I started researching this article, I wondered if delving into medieval bread laws and ancient pottery marks might seem irrelevant to modern business. But the deeper I dug, the more I realized that the fundamental principles of trademark protection haven't changed much over millennia. It is about protecting the symbols of Identity.


From the first baker's mark to digital logos in the metaverse, trademarks continue to serve the same essential functions: identifying sources, ensuring quality, and building trust. They protect our stories and the symbols that protect them.


For those of us running businesses in Australia today, understanding this rich history helps us avoid legal pitfalls and build brands with lasting protection. Whether you're selling physical products, digital services, or both, trademark protection remains as important now as it was when ancient craftspeople first started marking their creations.


Just as those early marks distinguished one potter's amphora from another's, your trademark distinguishes your business in today's crowded marketplace. And that's a tradition worth protecting. Because you're worth it (TM).


Secrets of Famous Trademarks
May 18, 2025
The Golden Ticket: What Makes a Trademark Truly Famous?
Enforcement Protect Your Brand
May 17, 2025
Trademark Infringement & Enforcement – How to Protect Your Brand
Protect Your Trademark Internationally
May 16, 2025
Why International Trademark Protection Matters
By Gareth Benson April 12, 2024
Ever since the printing press was invented, tools have empowered the innovation and creativity of humans to earn a pecuniary right from the things that they create. ChatGPT is no less than the most advanced typewriter made freely available to us. It should be used as such, as the good news is if you assert it you will still own the Intellectual Property that you create with it. In Australia, under the Copyright Act 1968, a person who is an Australian citizen or resident is the owner of copyright in a literary, dramatic, musical, or artistic work if it is original and involves an exertion of human skill, creativity, and independent intellectual effort. The intersection of IP and AI will become of increasing importance as AI technology advances. AI systems including ChatGPT, DALL*E and many others are capable of creating works that are protectable under IP law, such as music, artwork, and literature. AI systems can also be used to create inventions that are protectable under patent law. As the debate around Intellectual Property ownership evolves, the current position in Australia is that copyright must have a human author. In order for a work to be sufficiently original to attract protection under the Copyright Act, there needs to be an exertion of human skill. The adaptation of ChatGPT content by business owners is key to ensure that it involves ‘independent’ intellectual effort to then be assigned as Copyright. The following should be considered regarding Intellectual Property ownership and AI: Outputs of data which are generated solely by computer programs without any work or skill from a human creator have failed to meet the requirements for protection under copyright as they are not original literary works. Telstra Corporation Limited v Phone Directories Company Pty Ltd [2010] FCAFC 149 Factual data contained in a compilation is not sufficient to attract protection under the Copyright Act. In IceTV Pty Ltd v Nine Network Australia Pty Ltd [2009] HCA 14, the High Court considered that the lack of human intervention in the preparation of telephone directories by a database which outputs factual data through the use of a software program did not constitute an original literary work. However, under the Patents Act 1990 (Cth) an AI can be listed as the inventor on the registration, however it is not ultimately recognised as the owner given that it is not a legal entity. The court also considered the owner of the AI program would own any inventions made by the program. Thaler v Commissioner of Patents [2021] FCA 879 The printing press advanced the creative expression of humans, and advanced also our laws, laying the foundations for copyright laws created with the Statue of Anne during an age of enlightenment in 1709. Fast forward to 2023 and whilst AI will challenge laws of copyright, patents and IP ownership the foundation of intellectual property being a product of the human mind or intellect still remains a foundation of protection and commercialisation of ideas. For now.
By Gareth Benson February 28, 2024
The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into various industries is not just transforming operational efficiencies; it's also raising critical questions around intellectual property (IP) rights and how business can leverage the algorithm to create new assets. As AI continues to evolve, its adoption across industries presents unique opportunities not only in terms of managing value for creations by also creating assets from the output of Intellectual Property which AI can create. This week let's explore the intersection of AI and IP in the following two industries:
By Gareth Benson February 12, 2024
Whilst we live in a vastly digital world computers can not enter contracts - yet. Contracts have been used in ancient civilizations such as Egypt, Greece, and Rome, often written on clay tablets or papyrus used to establish agreements for the sale of goods, services, or property. In the 16th and 17th centuries, English common law developed the concept of a "consideration" as an essential element of a contract. This means that both parties have to exchange something of value for the contract to be legally binding. This still remains true today. It also must have Legal Capacity which means that two human beings must have the legal capacity to enter a contract. Until the law develops to recognise Artificial Intelligence as having distinct legal personality these are 5 key elements of constructing a contract between human beings or businesses with legal capacity. 1. Offer: One party makes an offer to another party. This offer must be definite and clear in its terms and conditions. 2. Acceptance: The other party accepts the offer, either expressly or by conduct. The acceptance must be unqualified and must correspond to the terms of the offer. 3. Consideration: There must be a benefit or detriment that is exchanged between the parties. This is known as consideration and is usually in the form of money, goods, or services. 4. Legal capacity: Both parties must have the legal capacity to enter into the contract. This means they must be of legal age, mentally competent, and not under duress or coercion. 5. Legal purpose: The contract must be for a legal purpose. Contracts that are illegal or against public policy are not enforceable. Myself and colleague Conni Warren will be exploring the fundamentals of corporate writing and contracts for success next week in Darwin. If you would like to join and learn of 5 further fundamentals of contract success. I have posted a link to the eventbrite below. All beings and open artificial intelligence, most welcome!
By Gareth Benson January 12, 2024
This past week as I commence lecturing at Charles Darwin University I have been remarking on how the Actors and Screen Writers Guild #strikes shutting down Hollywood are the first signs of unrest, which may become commonplace as, we negotiate a new world with #artificialintelligence (AI). The further development of AI, through the advent of both streaming services and the ability now to replicate or replace actors is challenging the way content is created and reshaping the way people work in various industries, including the entertainment sector. This evolution has significant implications for contracts, bargaining, and strikes in possibly every industry. As AI technologies advance, they have the potential to generate original content, mimic human performances, and automate certain aspects of the creative process. This raises questions about ownership, intellectual property rights, and the role of human artists and workers in the face of AI's capabilities. #contractlaw negotiations in the entertainment industry are now grappling with issues related to AI. Key considerations include determining ownership and control over AI-generated content, defining fair compensation and residuals for actors and artists in AI-driven productions, and addressing the ethical and legal implications of AI's impact on creative output. Bargaining power becomes crucial as artists, actors, and their representatives seek to protect their rights and ensure a fair share of the benefits derived from AI-generated content. On the other hand, studios and production companies are navigating the integration of AI technologies while addressing concerns surrounding job displacement, creative control, and financial considerations. Strikes, such as the current writers and actors' strike, may arise as a means for artists and actors to assert their demands and negotiate for fair working conditions, compensation, and rights in the context of AI-driven productions. These strikes can serve as a catalyst for discussions and reforms in other industries, influencing the way contracts are structured and how workers are protected in the evolving landscape of AI technology. Ultimately, the development of AI and its impact on content creation and employment necessitate ongoing dialogue, negotiation, and adaptation of contractual frameworks. The way contracts are structured, bargaining takes place, and strikes are employed will play a central role in shaping the future of AI and the working dynamics of various industries, including the entertainment sector. As a contract lawyer and lecturer I will be monitoring this space closely, and also in how we collectively can make more efficient agreements based on sound principles of agreement. The next question: can we negotiate contracts with AI run entities? Food for thought. 💡🤖🤔
By Gareth Benson December 12, 2023
Stopping all stations. Reflections from the World Commerce & Contracting conference. Participating in a global challenge on the use of Chat GPT in contract negotiations and in discussion with President Tim Cummins and CEO Sally Guyer at their conferene in Melbourne this week. It’s fair to say that A.I is here to stay. My reflections on the challenge: 🛠️😀 Efficiency: the use of ChatGPT can assist preparation for problem analysis breaking complex problems down and offering strategies, including questions to commence negotiations. 🛠️😀 Context counts: using this data and applying human context to the problem counts, there is a high duty of care to ensure application of the solution is appropriate and works. 🛠️😄 Communication is key: in the context of human negotiation communication is still paramaount to arrive at human resolutions. Robots will not replace this at any time soon. Human problems require, human communication and negotiation. Also it was found that our team who used ChatGPT performed better than those who did not 🤔🛠️ A report published by APAC shared reflections from the global community with regard to the use of A.I in the contracting process from 70 000 contract professionals from around the world. It reveals that 20 percent of workforce are already implementing generative A.I tools, 9 percent in Australia. There will be a competitive advantage for those that embrace these tools. Personllay I believe across industries that this could amount to a Fifth Industrial Revolution, given that entire industries, supply chains and jobs will be displaced and replaced. Contracting is just one part of this process. It’s good that we are having real and thorough discussion about it’s impact. It’s what humans do 😄 Wonderful to see Melbourne alive again with events bringing the city back to life!
By Gareth Benson November 12, 2023
I recently had the privilege of supporting Leigh Carnall of Civil Tech Solutions, whoose application of Artificial Intelligence in civil engineering for 3D surveying is inspiring. Leigh's innovative use of AI is set to revolutionise the way we perceive and navigate Northern Territory roads through cutting-edge 3D mapping technology. The foundation of all commercial deals are well written agreements. Our collaboration with Leigh underscored the pivotal role that a well-crafted contract plays in ensuring a clear commercial outcome. One of the key lessons learned was the critical importance of an agreements intellectual property provisions. As we assisted Leigh review this contract, our focus was on ensuring that Leigh had the necessary intellectual property rights to propel his business forward using Artificial Intelligence hardware. The 3D mapping tool's potential lay not only in its current applications but also in the treasure trove of data it could generate. We ensured that Leigh had full access and rights to leverage this data for future commercial endeavors. This experience reinforced the notion that contracts are more than legal documents; they are strategic tools for entrepreneurs like Leigh to build, protect and leverage their businesses. In the digital economy, where innovation is the currency of success, having robust intellectual property provisions are paramount. I’ve been passionate to share these insights in my book “Idealogoly: a compass to intellectual property success” which launched at the Darwin Innovation Hub over two years ago. It's a guide for those navigating the digital economy, offering practical advice on building, protecting, and leveraging ideas in this dynamic landscape where A.I is set to transform many different industries even further. I am focussing on the application of A.I in contracts this week in a series of posts for LinkedIn. Here's to the visionaries like Leigh Carnall whose application of AI and innovation in civil engineering is set to reshape his industry. If you're navigating the digital terrain with contracts and IP or passionate about the intersection of technology and business, I welcome you to join this conversation.
By Gareth Benson October 12, 2023
Last year I had the pleasure of advising US artist, Kris Kashtanova, during a challenging twist in her Intellectual Property journey. Kris is the author of the graphic novel "Zarya of the Dawn," an 18-page narrative set in a futuristic, deserted Manhattan, featuring a character inspired by the actress Zendaya. Beyond its captivating storytelling, Kris's work was produced with the assistance of of artificial intelligence. She asked me for advice in how to protect herself and the intellectual property in her creative output after her work was rejected by the US copyright office. Kris first achieved a significant milestone when she secured copyright in the work which could have been seen as a win for artists in the emerging world of AI-generated art. Kris took to social media, declaring that this legal protection meant artists could now safeguard their AI art projects, offering them the recognition and security they deserved. However, the elation was short-lived. In a surprising turn of events, the US Copyright Office reversed its decision in February, making Kris Kashtanova the first person in the country to lose legal protection for AI art. The abrupt change left both Kris and the artistic community grappling with uncertainty. To this point the US Copyright office has upheld that the writing of the novel could be protected in copyright, however the midjourney images can not as they are not considered “Human Authorship”. Since my initial advice one crucial takeaway from this experience is the recognition of the power of contracts in safeguarding the interests of IP owners, even when copyright registration might prove elusive. With industries now able to embrace generative A.I tools such as publishing, marketing and content creation business owners must proactively use contracts to establish ownership and license the output of their AI creations. Kris's journey underscores the need for all of us to be vigilant and take proactive measures in protecting our own IP rights in business. While copyright is a valuable tool, the absence of it does not leave IP owners defenseless. Well-drafted contracts can provide a robust legal framework, offering IP owners control over the use and dissemination of their AI-generated works. Whilst AI is destined to further transform industry, Kris’ story pushes new frontiers of how all of us can embrace A.I tools to own the output from which A.I creates. Let's continue the conversation on the importance of contracts as a powerful tool for IP owners to secure the creative output which A.I creates. Through proactive measures IP owners can seize the valuable advantage of using A.I whilst ensuring they own what we can create with these powerful tools.
More Posts