Trademark Infringement & Enforcement Protect Your Brand

May 17, 2025

Trademark Infringement & Enforcement – How to Protect Your Brand

Last month, a client called me in a panic. Someone had launched a business with a name nearly identical to hers, in the same industry, just two suburbs over. After pouring her heart into building her brand for three years, she was watching a copycat dilute everything she'd worked for.


That's the moment I realized how few Australian business owners truly understand trademark protection until their very identiy is being challenged. Whether you're brewing your first startup idea or defending decades of brand equity, trademark infringement puts everything you've built at risk.


I've compiled this guide after helping dozens of Australian businesses navigate these murky waters. Let's break down what constitutes infringement, how to spot it, and what practical steps you can take without blowing your budget on legal fees.



What Counts as Trademark Infringement?


In my recent  book Ideaology describe the journey of an idea like the voyage of a sailing ship—charting new waters, navigating through storms, and seeking new lands of opportunity. In this analogy, your brand is the flag that flies atop the mast of your ship. It signals to the world who you are, what you stand for, and where you’ve come from. It’s the first thing others see when your enterprise appears on the horizon.


But in rough seas and competitive waters, a flag that isn’t protected can be torn down, copied, or flown by another ship altogether. That’s where intellectual property—specifically, trademark law—comes in. Registering your trademark is like raising your flag and anchoring it with legal force. It declares to the world that this ship and everything it carries—its story, its values, its cargo of products and services—belongs to you. Without protecting that flag, you may find another vessel sailing under your colours, reaping the trust and goodwill you've built. Worse still, you may be told you're no longer permitted to fly your own flag in certain waters—as the Ugg Boots case so vividly demonstrates.


More technically, under the Trade Marks Act 1995, infringement happens when someone uses a sign that's identical or deceptively similar to your registered trademark for similar goods or services—without your permission. The courts use what lawyers call "the likelihood of confusion test" which examines:


  • How similar do the trademarks look, sound, or feel
  • What kinds of products or services are involved
  • How these goods are marketed to consumers
  • The established reputation of the original trademark


Customers don't need to be confused, the law only requires that confusion is likely. That distinction has saved (and sunk) many cases I've followed.



Real-World Trademark Battles That Changed the Game


Even industry giants find themselves in trademark showdowns. These cases offer valuable lessons for Australian businesses:

When Apple took on Samsung, it wasn't just about patents. The lawsuit also targeted how Samsung allegedly mimicked the iPhone's distinctive look and feel, arguing this created consumer confusion. This showcases how visual brand elements can become protected identity markers.


Nike battled a Chinese company that borrowed New Balance's recognisable "N" logo. Despite differences in the full brand name, the visual similarity was enough to trigger action—especially since many consumers in newer markets might not be familiar with both brands.


McDonald's has famously gone after countless businesses using the "Mc" prefix. While they haven't won every case (especially in Australia), their aggressive stance demonstrates how jealously companies guard distinctive naming patterns, particularly within related industries.


I've seen similar patterns play out with local businesses here. Once I had a client succesfully apply for the Trademark "The Corner Store" which normally would be considered a generic or industry term. It pays to get good advice from a Trademark Attorney!



Proving Trademark Infringement: The Evidence You'll Need


Last winter, I helped a client document trademark infringement by a former employee who'd started a competing business. Here's what proved most valuable in building our case:


You'll need to demonstrate:

  • Your trademark is validly registered with IP Australia
  • Someone's using a similar or identical mark without permission
  • They're using it commercially (not just personally)
  • The products or services are in the same category as yours
  • Consumers could reasonably be confused or misled


For evidence, start collecting:

I advise clients to create a dedicated folder with dated screenshots of websites and social media posts. One client even saved customer emails saying, "I thought I was buying from you!" These testimonials were gold in mediation.

Don't forget to document product packaging, marketing materials, and any public-facing content where the infringement appears. The timestamp on your trademark registration compared to their first use also matters significantly.



Trademark Dilution vs. Infringement: Why the Difference Matters


During a workshop I ran for creative entrepreneurs in Sydney at the World Commerce and Contracting APAC summit last year, this distinction generated the most questions. Trademark infringement hinges on customer confusion. Could someone mistake one brand for another?


Dilution, however, is trickier. It happens when a well-known trademark's distinctive quality gets weakened—even without confusion. Imagine a local electrician calling themselves "Tesla Electric" with a similar logo. Nobody would think they're affiliated with the car company, but Tesla might still argue dilution. Australian courts handle dilution claims more cautiously than American ones, but globally recognized brands have successfully made these arguments here. The more famous your brand, the stronger your dilution claim might be.


When Someone Steps on Your Trademark: Your Action Plan

After discovering possible infringement, follow these steps:

  1. Verify the infringement by checking your IP Australia registration details and comparing both offerings carefully. Ask yourself honestly: would a reasonable person be confused?
  2. Gather your evidence. I recommend creating a simple spreadsheet logging each instance with dates, screenshots, and descriptions. One client even recorded a video walkthrough showing side-by-side comparisons.
  3. Send a cease and desist letter. More than half the cases I've seen are resolved at this stage. The letter should be professional but firm, clearly outlining your rights and their violation. It will carry more weight on legal letterhead.
  4. Consult a trademark attorney if you don't get a satisfactory response we offer initial consultations complimentary.
  5. File formal complaints with relevant platforms or courts if necessary. When my client's designs were being copied on Etsy, the platform's IP reporting system removed the listings within 48 hours.


Trademark Counterfeiting: When Infringement Becomes Criminal


Counterfeiting takes infringement to another level—it's criminal territory. During my visit to Bali last year, the markets were flooded with fake Gucci and Louis Vuitton bags. Those aren't just civil infringements; they're criminal counterfeits.

In Australia, counterfeiting means intentionally producing or selling goods bearing a fake version of a registered trademark to deceive consumers.


Examples include:


  • Those "genuine" Nike shoes selling for suspiciously low prices at markets
  • Knockoff designer handbags with logos that look authentic at first glance
  • Repackaged beauty products with counterfeit branding


The penalties are serious: fines up to $93,900 per offense and potentially 5 years imprisonment under the Criminal Code Act 1995. Plus, you can still pursue civil damages. If you spot counterfeit versions of your products, report them to the Australian Border Force or IP Australia for investigation. One client discovered Chinese-made counterfeits of her patented device being imported and sold online—the ABF seizure protected both her brand and customers who might have purchased the unsafe knockoffs.



Fighting Social Media Trademark Violations


Last summer, a jewelry designer I know discovered an Instagram account using her brand name with slightly altered spelling, posting nearly identical product photos. This is increasingly common.

Common social media violations include:


  • Accounts mimicking your brand name or aesthetic
  • Unauthorised "fan pages" using your trademarks
  • Influencers falsely claiming affiliation
  • Competitors running ads using your brand name


Each platform offers specific reporting tools:

  • Instagram and Facebook have dedicated IP reporting forms
  • YouTube provides a trademark complaint process
  • LinkedIn and Twitter have similar mechanisms


These platforms typically require:

  • Proof of your trademark registration
  • Screenshots or links to the infringing content
  • A signed statement verifying your claim


In my experience, legitimate claims usually get processed within 1-3 weeks, though response times vary. The jewelry designer's case was resolved in just four days with the infringing account removed entirely.



Beyond Social: Dealing with Broader Online Infringement

E-commerce platforms and search engines present different challenges. Here's how to tackle them:

For marketplace violations: Amazon's Brand Registry gives you powerful tools if you're enrolled. I've seen listings removed within hours when properly reported.

eBay's VeRO Program protects intellectual property owners from unauthorised listings.

Etsy's IP reporting system works well for handmade goods and print-on-demand products.


For Google and domain issues: Google's trademark complaint form can stop competitors from using your brand in their ads.

Domain disputes can be addressed through ICANN (for .com domains) or auDA (for Australian domains).

A registered trademark dramatically strengthens your position in these scenarios. I recently helped a client recover a domain that was clearly registered to capitalise on their established brand name—our success hinged entirely on having proper trademark registration.


Frequently Asked Questions

How do I know if my trademark is being infringed? Someone using branding similar to your registered trademark—particularly for related products or services—might constitute infringement. Watch for copycat logos, names, slogans, or design elements that could confuse consumers.

What should I do if I receive a cease and desist letter? Don't panic, but don't ignore it either. Review the claims carefully. If they appear legitimate, consider complying or seeking legal advice immediately. If you believe the claims are baseless, consult an IP attorney about potential defenses.

Can I use a similar name if my business is completely different? Possibly, but it's risky. If the industries are entirely unrelated and the trademark isn't famous, you might avoid infringement. However, trademark law has many nuances, and businesses often expand into new categories. Always seek legal advice before proceeding.

Can I claim damages for trademark infringement? Yes. If infringement is proven, courts may award monetary compensation for lost sales or reputation damage. They may also order the infringer to stop using your mark and surrender profits they made from the infringement.

Will my Australian trademark protect me overseas? No. Your Australian registration only provides rights within Australia. For international protection, you'll need to register in individual countries or use the Madrid Protocol system to file internationally.

Protect Your Brand, Stay Vigilant

Throughout my years working with Australian businesses on trademark issues, one truth stands out: proactive protection always beats reactive enforcement.

Your trademark represents more than legal rights—it embodies your reputation, customer trust, and business identity. Taking action against infringement isn't just about legal compliance; it's about preserving everything you've built.


The businesses I've seen thrive over the long term follow this trademark protection playbook:

  • Register your trademark before problems arise
  • Monitor for potential infringers consistently
  • Act quickly when violations appear
  • Start with diplomatic approaches when possible
  • Don't hesitate to escalate when necessary

Whether you're a solo entrepreneur or scaling a nationwide brand, your trademark is worth fighting for. The good news? Australian law provides powerful tools to help you do exactly that.


Helpful Resources

IP Australia – Trade Marks

Madrid Protocol via WIPO

Australian Border Force – IP Rights








Secrets of Famous Trademarks
May 18, 2025
The Golden Ticket: What Makes a Trademark Truly Famous?
Ancient Symbols to Australian Law
May 16, 2025
The History of Trademarks: From Ancient Symbols to Australian Law
Protect Your Trademark Internationally
May 16, 2025
Why International Trademark Protection Matters
By Gareth Benson April 12, 2024
Ever since the printing press was invented, tools have empowered the innovation and creativity of humans to earn a pecuniary right from the things that they create. ChatGPT is no less than the most advanced typewriter made freely available to us. It should be used as such, as the good news is if you assert it you will still own the Intellectual Property that you create with it. In Australia, under the Copyright Act 1968, a person who is an Australian citizen or resident is the owner of copyright in a literary, dramatic, musical, or artistic work if it is original and involves an exertion of human skill, creativity, and independent intellectual effort. The intersection of IP and AI will become of increasing importance as AI technology advances. AI systems including ChatGPT, DALL*E and many others are capable of creating works that are protectable under IP law, such as music, artwork, and literature. AI systems can also be used to create inventions that are protectable under patent law. As the debate around Intellectual Property ownership evolves, the current position in Australia is that copyright must have a human author. In order for a work to be sufficiently original to attract protection under the Copyright Act, there needs to be an exertion of human skill. The adaptation of ChatGPT content by business owners is key to ensure that it involves ‘independent’ intellectual effort to then be assigned as Copyright. The following should be considered regarding Intellectual Property ownership and AI: Outputs of data which are generated solely by computer programs without any work or skill from a human creator have failed to meet the requirements for protection under copyright as they are not original literary works. Telstra Corporation Limited v Phone Directories Company Pty Ltd [2010] FCAFC 149 Factual data contained in a compilation is not sufficient to attract protection under the Copyright Act. In IceTV Pty Ltd v Nine Network Australia Pty Ltd [2009] HCA 14, the High Court considered that the lack of human intervention in the preparation of telephone directories by a database which outputs factual data through the use of a software program did not constitute an original literary work. However, under the Patents Act 1990 (Cth) an AI can be listed as the inventor on the registration, however it is not ultimately recognised as the owner given that it is not a legal entity. The court also considered the owner of the AI program would own any inventions made by the program. Thaler v Commissioner of Patents [2021] FCA 879 The printing press advanced the creative expression of humans, and advanced also our laws, laying the foundations for copyright laws created with the Statue of Anne during an age of enlightenment in 1709. Fast forward to 2023 and whilst AI will challenge laws of copyright, patents and IP ownership the foundation of intellectual property being a product of the human mind or intellect still remains a foundation of protection and commercialisation of ideas. For now.
By Gareth Benson February 28, 2024
The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into various industries is not just transforming operational efficiencies; it's also raising critical questions around intellectual property (IP) rights and how business can leverage the algorithm to create new assets. As AI continues to evolve, its adoption across industries presents unique opportunities not only in terms of managing value for creations by also creating assets from the output of Intellectual Property which AI can create. This week let's explore the intersection of AI and IP in the following two industries:
By Gareth Benson February 12, 2024
Whilst we live in a vastly digital world computers can not enter contracts - yet. Contracts have been used in ancient civilizations such as Egypt, Greece, and Rome, often written on clay tablets or papyrus used to establish agreements for the sale of goods, services, or property. In the 16th and 17th centuries, English common law developed the concept of a "consideration" as an essential element of a contract. This means that both parties have to exchange something of value for the contract to be legally binding. This still remains true today. It also must have Legal Capacity which means that two human beings must have the legal capacity to enter a contract. Until the law develops to recognise Artificial Intelligence as having distinct legal personality these are 5 key elements of constructing a contract between human beings or businesses with legal capacity. 1. Offer: One party makes an offer to another party. This offer must be definite and clear in its terms and conditions. 2. Acceptance: The other party accepts the offer, either expressly or by conduct. The acceptance must be unqualified and must correspond to the terms of the offer. 3. Consideration: There must be a benefit or detriment that is exchanged between the parties. This is known as consideration and is usually in the form of money, goods, or services. 4. Legal capacity: Both parties must have the legal capacity to enter into the contract. This means they must be of legal age, mentally competent, and not under duress or coercion. 5. Legal purpose: The contract must be for a legal purpose. Contracts that are illegal or against public policy are not enforceable. Myself and colleague Conni Warren will be exploring the fundamentals of corporate writing and contracts for success next week in Darwin. If you would like to join and learn of 5 further fundamentals of contract success. I have posted a link to the eventbrite below. All beings and open artificial intelligence, most welcome!
By Gareth Benson January 12, 2024
This past week as I commence lecturing at Charles Darwin University I have been remarking on how the Actors and Screen Writers Guild #strikes shutting down Hollywood are the first signs of unrest, which may become commonplace as, we negotiate a new world with #artificialintelligence (AI). The further development of AI, through the advent of both streaming services and the ability now to replicate or replace actors is challenging the way content is created and reshaping the way people work in various industries, including the entertainment sector. This evolution has significant implications for contracts, bargaining, and strikes in possibly every industry. As AI technologies advance, they have the potential to generate original content, mimic human performances, and automate certain aspects of the creative process. This raises questions about ownership, intellectual property rights, and the role of human artists and workers in the face of AI's capabilities. #contractlaw negotiations in the entertainment industry are now grappling with issues related to AI. Key considerations include determining ownership and control over AI-generated content, defining fair compensation and residuals for actors and artists in AI-driven productions, and addressing the ethical and legal implications of AI's impact on creative output. Bargaining power becomes crucial as artists, actors, and their representatives seek to protect their rights and ensure a fair share of the benefits derived from AI-generated content. On the other hand, studios and production companies are navigating the integration of AI technologies while addressing concerns surrounding job displacement, creative control, and financial considerations. Strikes, such as the current writers and actors' strike, may arise as a means for artists and actors to assert their demands and negotiate for fair working conditions, compensation, and rights in the context of AI-driven productions. These strikes can serve as a catalyst for discussions and reforms in other industries, influencing the way contracts are structured and how workers are protected in the evolving landscape of AI technology. Ultimately, the development of AI and its impact on content creation and employment necessitate ongoing dialogue, negotiation, and adaptation of contractual frameworks. The way contracts are structured, bargaining takes place, and strikes are employed will play a central role in shaping the future of AI and the working dynamics of various industries, including the entertainment sector. As a contract lawyer and lecturer I will be monitoring this space closely, and also in how we collectively can make more efficient agreements based on sound principles of agreement. The next question: can we negotiate contracts with AI run entities? Food for thought. 💡🤖🤔
By Gareth Benson December 12, 2023
Stopping all stations. Reflections from the World Commerce & Contracting conference. Participating in a global challenge on the use of Chat GPT in contract negotiations and in discussion with President Tim Cummins and CEO Sally Guyer at their conferene in Melbourne this week. It’s fair to say that A.I is here to stay. My reflections on the challenge: 🛠️😀 Efficiency: the use of ChatGPT can assist preparation for problem analysis breaking complex problems down and offering strategies, including questions to commence negotiations. 🛠️😀 Context counts: using this data and applying human context to the problem counts, there is a high duty of care to ensure application of the solution is appropriate and works. 🛠️😄 Communication is key: in the context of human negotiation communication is still paramaount to arrive at human resolutions. Robots will not replace this at any time soon. Human problems require, human communication and negotiation. Also it was found that our team who used ChatGPT performed better than those who did not 🤔🛠️ A report published by APAC shared reflections from the global community with regard to the use of A.I in the contracting process from 70 000 contract professionals from around the world. It reveals that 20 percent of workforce are already implementing generative A.I tools, 9 percent in Australia. There will be a competitive advantage for those that embrace these tools. Personllay I believe across industries that this could amount to a Fifth Industrial Revolution, given that entire industries, supply chains and jobs will be displaced and replaced. Contracting is just one part of this process. It’s good that we are having real and thorough discussion about it’s impact. It’s what humans do 😄 Wonderful to see Melbourne alive again with events bringing the city back to life!
By Gareth Benson November 12, 2023
I recently had the privilege of supporting Leigh Carnall of Civil Tech Solutions, whoose application of Artificial Intelligence in civil engineering for 3D surveying is inspiring. Leigh's innovative use of AI is set to revolutionise the way we perceive and navigate Northern Territory roads through cutting-edge 3D mapping technology. The foundation of all commercial deals are well written agreements. Our collaboration with Leigh underscored the pivotal role that a well-crafted contract plays in ensuring a clear commercial outcome. One of the key lessons learned was the critical importance of an agreements intellectual property provisions. As we assisted Leigh review this contract, our focus was on ensuring that Leigh had the necessary intellectual property rights to propel his business forward using Artificial Intelligence hardware. The 3D mapping tool's potential lay not only in its current applications but also in the treasure trove of data it could generate. We ensured that Leigh had full access and rights to leverage this data for future commercial endeavors. This experience reinforced the notion that contracts are more than legal documents; they are strategic tools for entrepreneurs like Leigh to build, protect and leverage their businesses. In the digital economy, where innovation is the currency of success, having robust intellectual property provisions are paramount. I’ve been passionate to share these insights in my book “Idealogoly: a compass to intellectual property success” which launched at the Darwin Innovation Hub over two years ago. It's a guide for those navigating the digital economy, offering practical advice on building, protecting, and leveraging ideas in this dynamic landscape where A.I is set to transform many different industries even further. I am focussing on the application of A.I in contracts this week in a series of posts for LinkedIn. Here's to the visionaries like Leigh Carnall whose application of AI and innovation in civil engineering is set to reshape his industry. If you're navigating the digital terrain with contracts and IP or passionate about the intersection of technology and business, I welcome you to join this conversation.
By Gareth Benson October 12, 2023
Last year I had the pleasure of advising US artist, Kris Kashtanova, during a challenging twist in her Intellectual Property journey. Kris is the author of the graphic novel "Zarya of the Dawn," an 18-page narrative set in a futuristic, deserted Manhattan, featuring a character inspired by the actress Zendaya. Beyond its captivating storytelling, Kris's work was produced with the assistance of of artificial intelligence. She asked me for advice in how to protect herself and the intellectual property in her creative output after her work was rejected by the US copyright office. Kris first achieved a significant milestone when she secured copyright in the work which could have been seen as a win for artists in the emerging world of AI-generated art. Kris took to social media, declaring that this legal protection meant artists could now safeguard their AI art projects, offering them the recognition and security they deserved. However, the elation was short-lived. In a surprising turn of events, the US Copyright Office reversed its decision in February, making Kris Kashtanova the first person in the country to lose legal protection for AI art. The abrupt change left both Kris and the artistic community grappling with uncertainty. To this point the US Copyright office has upheld that the writing of the novel could be protected in copyright, however the midjourney images can not as they are not considered “Human Authorship”. Since my initial advice one crucial takeaway from this experience is the recognition of the power of contracts in safeguarding the interests of IP owners, even when copyright registration might prove elusive. With industries now able to embrace generative A.I tools such as publishing, marketing and content creation business owners must proactively use contracts to establish ownership and license the output of their AI creations. Kris's journey underscores the need for all of us to be vigilant and take proactive measures in protecting our own IP rights in business. While copyright is a valuable tool, the absence of it does not leave IP owners defenseless. Well-drafted contracts can provide a robust legal framework, offering IP owners control over the use and dissemination of their AI-generated works. Whilst AI is destined to further transform industry, Kris’ story pushes new frontiers of how all of us can embrace A.I tools to own the output from which A.I creates. Let's continue the conversation on the importance of contracts as a powerful tool for IP owners to secure the creative output which A.I creates. Through proactive measures IP owners can seize the valuable advantage of using A.I whilst ensuring they own what we can create with these powerful tools.
More Posts